Model Comparison

GLM-5 vs GLM-5.2Which is better in 2026?

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is 1.4x cheaper per token.

Verdict: GLM-5 vs GLM-5.2 — which is better?

GLM-5 (by Zhipu AI) and GLM-5.2 (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

GLM-5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 is better at 1 benchmark (MCP Atlas). GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, GLM-5 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.2 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose GLM-5 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token

Choose GLM-5.2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

GLM-5 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.2 is better at 1 benchmark (MCP Atlas).

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-5 costs less

For input processing, GLM-5 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than GLM-5.2 ($1.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, GLM-5 ($3.20/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than GLM-5.2 ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.2 is more expensive than GLM-5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input tokens$1.00
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerFriendliAI
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerFriendliAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

9.0B diff

GLM-5.2 has 9.0B more parameters than GLM-5, making it 1.2% larger.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
744.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2
753.0Bparameters
744.0B
GLM-5
753.0B
GLM-5.2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.2 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to GLM-5's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5.2 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

GLM-5

MIT

Open weights

GLM-5.2

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GLM-5 was released on 2026-02-11, while GLM-5.2 was released on 2026-06-16.

GLM-5.2 is 4 months newer than GLM-5.

GLM-5

Feb 11, 2026

4 months ago

GLM-5.2

Jun 16, 2026

0 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GLM-5 is available from FriendliAI, ZAI. GLM-5.2 is available from FriendliAI, Novita, ZAI.

GLM-5

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M

GLM-5.2

friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher MCP Atlas score (76.8% vs 67.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Zhipu AI
GLM-5
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2

FAQ

Common questions about GLM-5 vs GLM-5.2.

Which is better, GLM-5 or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GLM-5 is made by Zhipu AI and GLM-5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does GLM-5 compare to GLM-5.2 in benchmarks?

GLM-5 scores t2-bench: 89.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 77.8%, BrowseComp: 75.9%, MCP Atlas: 67.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 56.2%. GLM-5.2 scores AIME 2026: 99.2%, HMMT 2025: 94.4%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.5%, GPQA: 91.2%, IMO-AnswerBench: 91.0%.

Is GLM-5 cheaper than GLM-5.2?

GLM-5 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. GLM-5 costs $1.00/M input and $3.20/M output via friendli. GLM-5.2 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via friendli.

What are the context window sizes for GLM-5 and GLM-5.2?

GLM-5 supports 200K tokens and GLM-5.2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GLM-5 and GLM-5.2?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($1.00 vs $1.40/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.