The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 23.9 to 2.3.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 23.9 to 2.3, ranking #162 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 23.9 and ranks #162 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
2.3
#304
23.9
#162
2.8
#292
24.7
#144
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
65,536

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
4.3#92
13.6#50
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) · 23 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

77.0B diff

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking has 77.0B more parameters than Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512), making it 2566.7% larger.

Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
3.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
80.0Bparameters
3.0B
Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies input context (65,536 tokens). Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Mistral AI
Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) is 3 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512)
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 23.9 to 2.3. Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) is made by Mistral AI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) scores MATH: 83.0%, Wild Bench: 56.8%, Arena Hard: 30.5%, MM-MT-Bench: 7.8%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (2.3 vs 23.9), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Ministral 3 (3B Instruct 2512) is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.