Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Mistral AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose Phi 4 Reasoning
- you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, LiveCodeBench), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Playground indexes and blind preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning has 11.0B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 366.7% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (131,100 tokens). Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Phi 4 Reasoning
License
Usage and distribution terms
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 7 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.
Dec 4, 2025
8 months ago
7mo newerApr 30, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s cutoff date.
—
Mar 2025
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Phi 4 Reasoning.
Related comparisons
More Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) comparisons
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs GLM-5.3
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Qwen3.8-27B
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Gemini 3.7 Flash
- Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) vs Grok 4.6