Mistral Large 4 vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Mistral Large 4 leads the LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 2.8. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is 16.5x cheaper per token.
Mistral AI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mistral Large 4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.2 to 2.8, ranking #34 overall.
On price, Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is roughly 16.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mistral Large 4 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Mistral Large 4
- overall performance matters — it scores 46.2 and ranks #34 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
- cost matters — it's about 16.5x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for Mistral Large 4 · 15 for Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Mistral Large 4 and Phi-4-multimodal-instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Mistral Large 4 ($0.68/1M tokens) is 13.6x more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.05/1M tokens).
For output processing, Mistral Large 4 ($2.09/1M tokens) is 20.9x more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Large 4 is more expensive than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Large 4 has 1044.4B more parameters than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct, making it 18650.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mistral Large 4 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's 128,000 tokens. Only Phi-4-multimodal-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Mistral Large 4 and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Mistral Large 4
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
License
Usage and distribution terms
Mistral Large 4 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mistral Large 4 was released on 2026-10-06, while Phi-4-multimodal-instruct was released on 2025-02-01.
Mistral Large 4 is 20 months newer than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.
Oct 6, 2026
2 days ago
1.7yr newerFeb 1, 2025
1.7 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Mistral Large 4's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Phi-4-multimodal-instruct's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Large 4's cutoff date.
—
Jun 2024
Provider Availability
Mistral Large 4 is available from Mistral AI. Phi-4-multimodal-instruct is available from DeepInfra.
Mistral Large 4
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Mistral Large 4 and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Large 4 vs Phi-4-multimodal-instruct.