Model Comparison

Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Mistral NeMo Instruct (by Mistral AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Mistral NeMo Instruct is roughly 13.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Mistral NeMo Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 13.3x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral NeMo Instruct costs less

For input processing, Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Mistral NeMo Instruct ($0.15/1M tokens) is 28.3x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Mistral NeMo Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.15
Best providerGoogle
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral NeMo Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Mistral NeMo Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Jul 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral NeMo Instruct does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Mistral NeMo Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral NeMo Instruct was released on 2024-07-18, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 24 months newer than Mistral NeMo Instruct.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

Jul 18, 2024

2.0 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Mistral NeMo Instruct is available from Google, Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Mistral NeMo Instruct

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.15/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral NeMo Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Mistral NeMo Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral NeMo Instruct (Mistral AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Mistral NeMo Instruct compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Mistral NeMo Instruct scores HellaSwag: 83.5%, Winogrande: 76.8%, TriviaQA: 73.8%, CommonSenseQA: 70.4%, MMLU: 68.0%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Mistral NeMo Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Mistral NeMo Instruct costs $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output via google. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral NeMo Instruct supports 128K tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.15 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral NeMo Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral NeMo Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.