Model Comparison

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (by Mistral AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is roughly 22.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark 1.1 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct if…

  • cost matters — it's about 22.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens) is 17.9x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct ($0.14/1M tokens) is 30.4x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark 1.1 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's 32,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 18 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Jan 30, 2025

1.5 years ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.1's cutoff date.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

Oct 2023

Muse Spark 1.1

—

Provider Availability

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Meta
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct or Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (Mistral AI) and Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct scores Arena Hard: 87.6%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MT-Bench: 83.5%, IFEval: 82.9%, MATH: 70.6%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is 17.9x cheaper for input tokens. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct supports 32K tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include context window (32K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.07 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct and Muse Spark 1.1?

Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is developed by Mistral AI and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons