Model Comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning
Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Arena Hard), while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).
Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has 10.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 71.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct specifies output context (32,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Phi 4 Reasoning uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct was released on 2025-01-30, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.
Phi 4 Reasoning is 3 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct.
Jan 30, 2025
1.3 years ago
Apr 30, 2025
1.1 years ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct has a knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Phi 4 Reasoning has a cutoff of 2025-03-01.
Phi 4 Reasoning has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct (2023-10-01).
Oct 2023
Mar 2025
1.4 yr newerOutputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
View detailsMistral AI
Phi 4 Reasoning
View detailsMicrosoft
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning.