The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

Choose Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
Released
Mar 2025
Sep 2024
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

8.5B diff

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 8.5B more parameters than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base, making it 35.4% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
24.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
32.5Bparameters
24.0B
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
32.5B
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 32B Instruct does not.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base was released on 2025-03-17, while Qwen2.5 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Mar 17, 2025

1.4 years ago

5mo newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is made by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base compare to Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base scores MMLU: 81.0%, TriviaQA: 80.5%, MMMU: 59.3%, MMLU-Pro: 56.0%, GPQA: 37.5%. Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.9%, HumanEval: 88.4%, HellaSwag: 85.2%, BBH: 84.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports 128K tokens and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.