Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Nova Micro
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 8.4 to 2.4. Nova Micro is 1.8x cheaper per token.
Mistral AI · Amazon · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.4 to 2.4, ranking #294 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Nova Micro is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
- overall performance matters — it scores 8.4 and ranks #294 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Nova Micro
- cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
15 reported for Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct · 17 for Nova Micro
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU), while Nova Micro is better at 0 benchmarks.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.07/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens).
For output processing, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is more expensive than Nova Micro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Nova Micro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nova Micro uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct was released on 2025-06-20, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is 7 months newer than Nova Micro.
Jun 20, 2025
1.3 years ago
7mo newerNov 20, 2024
1.9 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Nova Micro's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nova Micro's cutoff date.
Oct 2023
—
Provider Availability
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is available from DeepInfra. Nova Micro is available from Bedrock.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Nova Micro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct and Nova Micro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct vs Nova Micro.