Model Comparison
Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?
Mistral Small 4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3 30B A3B is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?
Mistral Small 4 (by Mistral AI) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Mistral Small 4 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (Arena Hard). Mistral Small 4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 30B A3B is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mistral Small 4 also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Mistral Small 4 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Mistral Small 4 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (Arena Hard).
Mistral Small 4 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Mistral Small 4 ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Mistral Small 4 ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mistral Small 4 is more expensive than Qwen3 30B A3B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Mistral Small 4 has 88.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 290.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mistral Small 4 accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3 30B A3B's 128,000 tokens. Mistral Small 4 can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Qwen3 30B A3B is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Mistral Small 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 30B A3B does not.
Mistral Small 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Mistral Small 4
Qwen3 30B A3B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Mistral Small 4 was released on 2026-03-16, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.
Mistral Small 4 is 11 months newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.
Mar 16, 2026
4 months ago
10mo newerApr 29, 2025
1.3 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Mistral Small 4 is available from Mistral AI. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.
Mistral Small 4
Qwen3 30B A3B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Mistral Small 4
View detailsMistral AI
Qwen3 30B A3B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 4 and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Mistral Small 4 vs Qwen3 30B A3B.