The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Mistral Small 4 vs QwQ-32B

Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B are closely matched at 19.0 and 14.8 on the LLM Stats Score.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.0 and 14.8.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mistral Small 4 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Mistral Small 4

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.0
#209
14.8
#232
19.9
#191
15.6
#223
10.7
#162
10.3
#164
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Mistral Small 4
QwQ-32B
19.0#170
18.1#186
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Mistral Small 4 · 7 for QwQ-32B

2 shared

Mistral Small 4 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Mistral Small 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

86.5B diff

Mistral Small 4 has 86.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B, making it 266.2% larger.

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
119.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
119.0B
Mistral Small 4
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Mistral Small 4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Mistral Small 4 specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Mistral Small 4
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Mistral Small 4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Mistral Small 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Mistral Small 4

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Mistral Small 4 was released on 2026-03-16, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

Mistral Small 4 is 13 months newer than QwQ-32B.

Mistral Small 4

Mar 16, 2026

6 months ago

1.0yr newer
QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Mistral Small 4's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mistral Small 4's cutoff date.

Mistral Small 4

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Mistral Small 4
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Mistral Small 4 vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Mistral Small 4 or QwQ-32B?

Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.0 and 14.8. Mistral Small 4 is made by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Mistral Small 4 compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Mistral Small 4 scores AIME 2025: 83.8%, MMLU-Pro: 78.0%, AA-LCR: 71.2%, GPQA: 71.2%, LiveCodeBench: 63.6%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B?

Mistral Small 4 supports 256K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.0 vs 14.8), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Mistral Small 4 and QwQ-32B?

Mistral Small 4 is developed by Mistral AI and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.