The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 46.0 to 35.5.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 46.0 to 35.5, ranking #25 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Glimmer-30B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 46.0 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Glimmer-30B
Meta
Qwen3.7 Max
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
35.5
#76
46.0
#25
Reasoning
34.7
#77
46.8
#19
Coding
23.8
#65
38.2
#20
Agents
18.5
#62
30.6
#27
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
— / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Muse Glimmer-30B
Qwen3.7 Max
Math
28.3#84
43.4#2
Vision
20.4#61
25.5#38
Tool use
18.6#59
27.8#18
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

25 reported for Muse Glimmer-30B · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

8 shared

Muse Glimmer-30B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 8 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, MCP Atlas, SciCode, SkillsBench, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified).

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7 Max specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Meta
Muse Glimmer-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7 Max
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Glimmer-30B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Muse Glimmer-30B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.7 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Glimmer-30B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.7 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Glimmer-30B was released on 2026-08-10, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Muse Glimmer-30B is 3 months newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Aug 10, 2026

2 weeks ago

2mo newer
Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Muse Glimmer-30B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-04, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Muse Glimmer-30B's training data extends to 2026-01-04, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Muse Glimmer-30B

Jan 2026

Qwen3.7 Max

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Glimmer-30B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.7 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Glimmer-30B vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Muse Glimmer-30B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 46.0 to 35.5. Muse Glimmer-30B is made by Meta and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Glimmer-30B compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Muse Glimmer-30B scores AIME 2026: 94.7%, Siren AgentDojo Utility: 94.2%, GPQA: 83.5%, AA-LCR: 80.0%, CharXiv-R: 78.8%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7 Max?

Muse Glimmer-30B supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (35.5 vs 46.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Glimmer-30B and Qwen3.7 Max?

Muse Glimmer-30B is developed by Meta and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons