Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.2Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.2 — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and GLM-5.2 (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, Toolathlon), while GLM-5.2 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1). Muse Spark 1.1 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 5 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose GLM-5.2 if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, Toolathlon), while GLM-5.2 is better at 2 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Muse Spark 1.1 has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.2 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only GLM-5.2 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Muse Spark 1.1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.2 does not.

Muse Spark 1.1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark 1.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-5.2 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5.2

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while GLM-5.2 was released on 2026-06-16.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 1 month newer than GLM-5.2.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

3w newer
GLM-5.2

Jun 16, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 54.7%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (88.1% vs 76.8%)
Higher Toolathlon score (75.6% vs 48.2%)
Zhipu AI
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (62.1% vs 61.5%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.1 score (82.7% vs 80.0%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.2
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.2.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or GLM-5.2?

Muse Spark 1.1 has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and GLM-5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to GLM-5.2 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. GLM-5.2 scores AIME 2026: 99.2%, HMMT 2025: 94.4%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.5%, GPQA: 91.2%, IMO-AnswerBench: 91.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.2?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports an unknown number of tokens and GLM-5.2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.2?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and GLM-5.2?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons