Model Comparison

Muse Spark 1.1 vs MiMo-V2-OmniWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Muse Spark 1.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni — which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) and MiMo-V2-Omni (by Xiaomi) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose MiMo-V2-Omni if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omnidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Omni specifies input context (262,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Omni specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input262,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2-Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2-Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while MiMo-V2-Omni was released on 2026-03-18.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2-Omni.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer
MiMo-V2-Omni

Mar 18, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Meta

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Xiaomi
Larger context window (262,000 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Omni
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Omni

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni?

Muse Spark 1.1 (Meta) and MiMo-V2-Omni (Xiaomi) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to MiMo-V2-Omni in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. MiMo-V2-Omni scores PinchBench: 81.2%, SWE-Bench Verified: 74.8%, Claw-Eval: 54.8%, MM-BrowserComp: 52.0%, OmniGAIA: 49.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons