The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched at 51.0 and 41.1 on the LLM Stats Score. Muse Spark 1.2 is 16.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 41.1.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark 1.2 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Muse Spark 1.2 is roughly 16.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output

Choose Muse Spark 1.2

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 16.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.0
#12
41.1
#44
51.5
#9
34.4
#80
37.3
#23
33.3
#35
37.0
#13
29.3
#31
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
$0.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Muse Spark 1.1 · 3 for Muse Spark 1.2

2 shared

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.2 is better at 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

Muse Spark 1.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Muse Spark 1.2 costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens) is 12.5x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2 ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens) is 21.3x more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2 ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than Muse Spark 1.2.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.2
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Muse Spark 1.2 was released on 2026-08-05.

Muse Spark 1.2 is 1 month newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark 1.2

Aug 5, 2026

3 weeks ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API. Muse Spark 1.2 is available from Meta Model API.

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M

Muse Spark 1.2

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Muse Spark 1.2.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 41.1. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Muse Spark 1.2 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Muse Spark 1.2 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.9%, Meta Internal Coding Bench: 70.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 59.3%.

Is Muse Spark 1.1 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta. Muse Spark 1.2 costs $0.10/M input and $0.20/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Muse Spark 1.2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 41.1), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.