The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Meta · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Toolathlon), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 4 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, DeepSWE 1.1, Job Bench, SWE-Bench Pro). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
2 of 6
4 of 6
Input price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
Released
Jul 2026
Aug 2026
License
Proprietary
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Muse Spark 1.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Toolathlon), while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 4 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, DeepSWE 1.1, Job Bench, SWE-Bench Pro).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Aug 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark 1.1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 2 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 months ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.1
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.1 or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Muse Spark 1.1 compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.1 and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.