The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 18.6.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 18.6, ranking #5 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark 1.3

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.3 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Spark 1.3
Meta
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.3
#5
18.6
#200
Reasoning
52.8
#7
17.4
#198
Coding
41.7
#10
14.6
#125
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Muse Spark 1.3 · 6 for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

No common benchmarks found

Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Muse Spark 1.3 specifies output context (943,718 tokens).

Meta
Muse Spark 1.3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output943,718 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark 1.3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Muse Spark 1.3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Muse Spark 1.3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark 1.3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark 1.3

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Spark 1.3 was released on 2026-09-02, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18.

Muse Spark 1.3 is 13 months newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Muse Spark 1.3

Sep 2, 2026

5 days ago

1.0yr newer
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Spark 1.3's cutoff date.

Muse Spark 1.3

—

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark 1.3
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark 1.3 vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.3 or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Muse Spark 1.3 leads the LLM Stats Score 55.3 to 18.6. Muse Spark 1.3 is made by Meta and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark 1.3 compare to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 in benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores MRCR v2 (8-needle): 98.5%, MRCR v2 (8-needle, 512K-1M): 98.1%, DeepSearchQA: 89.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.4%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Muse Spark 1.3 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.3 vs 18.6), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark 1.3 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons