The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder Full vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -2.7.

Meta · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder Full leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -2.7, ranking #12 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.6 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Wonder Full
Meta
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.6
#12
-2.7
#364
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder Full · 1 for Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

No common benchmarks found

Muse Wonder Full and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder Full and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Wonder Full is licensed under a proprietary license, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Muse Wonder Full was released on 2026-10-12, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) was released on 2026-08-04.

Muse Wonder Full is 2 months newer than Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

1 weeks ago

2mo newer
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Aug 4, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder Full and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder Full
✓ Preferred
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder Full vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

Which is better, Muse Wonder Full or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Muse Wonder Full leads the LLM Stats Score 52.6 to -2.7. Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder Full compare to Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) scores XSTest: 94.6%.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder Full and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.6 vs -2.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Wonder Full and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Muse Wonder Full is developed by Meta and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons