The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Wonder vs Muse Wonder Full

Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched at 47.9 and 52.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Meta · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 47.9 and 52.1.

In the 16 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Wonder Full wins 15; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Wonder

  • you want predictable pricing at $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder Full

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 15 of 16 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
47.9
#29
52.1
#13
33.1
#108
38.4
#71
38.9
#18
41.5
#8
34.1
#24
38.5
#8
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 16
15 of 16
Input price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Muse Wonder
Muse Wonder Full
25.4#53
31.7#28
25.4#52
31.8#25
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Muse Wonder · 16 for Muse Wonder Full

16 shared

Muse Wonder outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MemoryBench), while Muse Wonder Full is better at 15 benchmarks (Artificial Analysis, AutomationBench-AA, DeepSWE 1.1, FocusBench, GDP.pdf, Harvey LAB-AA, HealthBench Professional, JobBench, OSWorld 2.1 (partial), OSWorld 2.1 (strict), Personal Superintelligence Index, Program Bench, SWE-Marathon, Terminal-Bench 4.0-AA, Vals Finance Agent v2).

Muse Wonder Full significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Muse Wonder specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Meta
Muse Wonder
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder Full
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder Full

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder Full

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-10-12.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

Muse Wonder Full

Oct 12, 2026

-1 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Wonder
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder Full
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Wonder vs Muse Wonder Full.

Which is better, Muse Wonder or Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 47.9 and 52.1. Muse Wonder is made by Meta and Muse Wonder Full is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Wonder compare to Muse Wonder Full in benchmarks?

Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%. Muse Wonder Full scores MemoryBench: 85.5%, DeepSWE 1.1: 79.0%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 78.4%, JobBench: 75.3%, HealthBench Professional: 62.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full?

Muse Wonder supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Wonder Full supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (47.9 vs 52.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.