Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 36.3. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is 2.0x cheaper per token.

NVIDIA · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 36.3, ranking #29 overall.

In the 13 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7 Max wins 11; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7 Max also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026
you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Qwen3.7 Max

overall performance matters — it scores 45.5 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 11 of 13 exact shared results
you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

NVIDIA

Qwen3.7 Max

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

36.3

#79 · 25 evals

45.5

#29 · 37 evals

Best

Reasoning

35.4

#82 · 22 evals

46.2

#27 · 24 evals

Best

Coding

21.0

#93 · 5 evals

36.1

#24 · 10 evals

Best

Agents

12.5

#101 · 8 evals

29.2

#38 · 13 evals

Best

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

2 of 13

11 of 13

Best

Input price

$0.50 / M

Best

$1.25 / M

Output price

$2.20 / M

Best

$3.75 / M

Context window

262,144

1,000,000

Best

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared

Index

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Qwen3.7 Max

Math

36.4#39 · 6 evals

43.0#3 · 13 evals

Tool use

2.8#166 · 2 evals

26.9#26 · 5 evals

Finance

29.0#31 · 5 evals

41.1#1 · 4 evals

Legal

33.5#9 · 3 evals

44.5#1 · 3 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

26 reported for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) · 42 for Qwen3.7 Max

13 shared

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) outperforms in 2 benchmarks (IFBench, IMO-AnswerBench), while Qwen3.7 Max is better at 11 benchmarks (CritPT, Finance Agent v2, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, SciCode, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, WMT24++).

Qwen3.7 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs less

For input processing, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($2.20/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max ($3.75/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7 Max is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Input tokens$0.50

Output tokens$2.20

Best providerDeepinfra

Qwen3.7 Max

Input tokens$1.25

Output tokens$3.75

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7 Max accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3.7 Max is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Qwen3.7 Max

Input1,000,000 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Qwen3.7 Max uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Qwen3.7 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) was released on 2026-06-04, while Qwen3.7 Max was released on 2026-05-19.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is 1 month newer than Qwen3.7 Max.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Jun 4, 2026

3 months ago

2w newer

Qwen3.7 Max

May 19, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-09-30, while Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)'s training data extends to 2025-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7 Max's cutoff date.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Sep 2025

Qwen3.7 Max

—

Provider Availability

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is available from DeepInfra. Qwen3.7 Max is available from Novita, DeepInfra, Together.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.20/1M

Qwen3.7 Max

Novita

Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.7 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)

✓ Preferred

Qwen3.7 Max

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.7 Max.

Which is better, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) or Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 45.5 to 36.3. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3.7 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) compare to Qwen3.7 Max in benchmarks?

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) scores RULER: 94.7%, IMO-AnswerBench: 92.3%, PinchBench: 90.0%, LiveCodeBench v6: 89.0%, GPQA: 87.0%. Qwen3.7 Max scores HMMT Feb 26: 97.1%, Kernel Bench L3: 96.0%, MMLU-Redux: 95.0%, IFEval: 94.3%, GPQA: 92.4%.

Is Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) costs $0.50/M input and $2.20/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3.7 Max costs $1.25/M input and $3.75/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.7 Max supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.3 vs 45.5), context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $1.25/M), licensing (OpenMDW License v1.1 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Qwen3.7 Max?

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3.7 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Qwen3.7 Max