Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Solar Mini 4
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Solar Mini 4 are closely matched at 36.0 and 31.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Solar Mini 4 is 5.3x cheaper per token.
NVIDIA · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Solar Mini 4 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 36.0 and 31.9.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Solar Mini 4 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Solar Mini 4 is roughly 5.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Solar Mini 4 also accepts a larger context window (524,288 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Solar Mini 4
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 5.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 524,288 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
26 reported for Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) · 6 for Solar Mini 4
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Solar Mini 4 is better at 2 benchmarks (AA-LCR, SciCode).
Solar Mini 4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($0.50/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Solar Mini 4 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) ($2.20/1M tokens) is 5.5x more expensive than Solar Mini 4 ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is more expensive than Solar Mini 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has 515.0B more parameters than Solar Mini 4, making it 1471.4% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Solar Mini 4 accepts 524,288 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Solar Mini 4 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is licensed under OpenMDW License v1.1, while Solar Mini 4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) was released on 2026-06-04, while Solar Mini 4 was released on 2026-09-22.
Solar Mini 4 is 4 months newer than Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B).
Jun 4, 2026
4 months ago
Sep 22, 2026
2 weeks ago
3mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-09-30, while Solar Mini 4 has a cutoff of 2026-02-01.
Solar Mini 4 has more recent training data (up to 2026-02-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) (2025-09-30).
Sep 2025
Feb 2026
5 mo newerProvider Availability
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) is available from DeepInfra. Solar Mini 4 is available from Upstage.
Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B)
Solar Mini 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) and Solar Mini 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Nemotron 3 Ultra (550B A55B) vs Solar Mini 4.