The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Nova 2 Omni vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Nova 2 Omni leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 18.3.

Amazon · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nova 2 Omni leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 18.3, ranking #155 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nova 2 Omni wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Nova 2 Omni

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.7 and ranks #155 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Nova 2 Omni
Amazon
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.7
#155
18.3
#213
Reasoning
28.0
#131
19.5
#199
Agents
4.7
#151
7.2
#136
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 5
2 of 5
Input price
— / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.99 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Nova 2 Omni
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Math
25.1#114
22.3#138
Vision
7.2#143
12.2#104
Writing
23.5#9
12.0#63
Multimodal
8.7#122
15.0#90
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Nova 2 Omni · 50 for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

5 shared

Nova 2 Omni outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MMLU-Pro, Video-MME), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (MMMU-Pro, ScreenSpot).

Nova 2 Omni has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Amazon
Nova 2 Omni
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Nova 2 Omni and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nova 2 Omni

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nova 2 Omni is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nova 2 Omni

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nova 2 Omni was released on 2025-12-02, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Nova 2 Omni is 2 months newer than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Nova 2 Omni

Dec 2, 2025

9 months ago

2mo newer
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

12 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Nova 2 Omni and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Nova 2 Omni
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Nova 2 Omni vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking.

Which is better, Nova 2 Omni or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova 2 Omni leads the LLM Stats Score 25.7 to 18.3. Nova 2 Omni is made by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Nova 2 Omni compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking in benchmarks?

Nova 2 Omni scores AIME 2025: 92.1%, RefCOCOg: 86.3%, ScreenSpot: 85.4%, MMLU-Pro: 80.7%, Tau2 Telecom: 80.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, MMLU-Redux: 90.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Nova 2 Omni and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova 2 Omni supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nova 2 Omni and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.7 vs 18.3), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nova 2 Omni and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Nova 2 Omni is developed by Amazon and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons