Model Comparison

Nova Lite vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Lite is 13.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

27 benchmarks

Nova Lite outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 26 benchmarks (ARC-C, BBH, BFCL, ChartQA, CRAG, DocVQA, DROP, EgoSchema, FinQA, GPQA, GroundUI-1K, GSM8k, HumanEval, IFEval, LVBench, MATH, MMLU, MM-Mind2Web, MMMU, SQuALITY, TextVQA, Translation en→Set1 COMET22, Translation en→Set1 spBleu, Translation Set1→en COMET22, Translation Set1→en spBleu, VisualWebBench).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Lite costs less

For input processing, Nova Lite ($0.06/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Nova Lite ($0.24/1M tokens) is 13.3x cheaper than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Nova Pro is more expensive than Nova Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
Amazon
Nova Lite
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.24
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 300,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Nova Lite is limited to 2,048 tokens.

Amazon
Nova Lite
Input300,000 tokens
Output2,048 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Wed Apr 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Nova Lite and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Nova Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Nova Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2024-11-20.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Nova Lite

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Nova Lite is available from Bedrock. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Nova Lite

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.24/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Amazon
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Amazon
Higher ARC-C score (94.8% vs 92.4%)
Higher BBH score (86.9% vs 82.4%)
Higher BFCL score (68.4% vs 66.6%)
Higher ChartQA score (89.2% vs 86.8%)
Higher CRAG score (50.3% vs 43.8%)
Higher DocVQA score (93.5% vs 92.4%)
Higher DROP score (85.4% vs 80.2%)
Higher EgoSchema score (72.1% vs 71.4%)
Higher FinQA score (77.2% vs 73.6%)
Higher GPQA score (46.9% vs 42.0%)
Higher GroundUI-1K score (81.4% vs 80.2%)
Higher GSM8k score (94.8% vs 94.5%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 85.4%)
Higher IFEval score (92.1% vs 89.7%)
Higher LVBench score (41.6% vs 40.4%)
Higher MATH score (76.6% vs 73.3%)
Higher MMLU score (85.9% vs 80.5%)
Higher MM-Mind2Web score (63.7% vs 60.7%)
Higher MMMU score (61.7% vs 56.2%)
Higher SQuALITY score (19.8% vs 19.2%)
Higher TextVQA score (81.5% vs 80.2%)
Higher Translation en→Set1 COMET22 score (89.1% vs 88.8%)
Higher Translation en→Set1 spBleu score (43.4% vs 41.5%)
Higher Translation Set1→en COMET22 score (89.0% vs 88.8%)
Higher Translation Set1→en spBleu score (44.4% vs 43.1%)
Higher VisualWebBench score (79.7% vs 77.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Amazon
Nova Lite
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Nova Lite vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Lite is made by Amazon and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Nova Lite scores GSM8k: 94.5%, ARC-C: 92.4%, DocVQA: 92.4%, IFEval: 89.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.8%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.
Nova Lite is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. Nova Lite costs $0.06/M input and $0.24/M output via bedrock. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.
Nova Lite supports 300K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.