Model Comparison

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 32B

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.9B diff

Qwen3 32B has 23.9B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 268.5% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is 4 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

8 months ago

3mo newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Qwen3 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 32B's cutoff date.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Qwen3 32B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher LiveCodeBench score (71.1% vs 65.7%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2025 score (72.9% vs 72.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 32B

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.