Model Comparison

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 (by NVIDIA) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Nemotron Nano 9B v2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

22.1B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 22.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 248.3% larger.

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Mon Jun 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Nano 9B v2 does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is licensed under NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement , while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1 month newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

10 months ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2025 score (72.1% vs 69.3%)
Higher IFEval score (90.3% vs 85.8%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 64.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Nemotron Nano 9B v2 vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Nemotron Nano 9B v2 or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Nemotron Nano 9B v2 compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Nemotron Nano 9B v2 and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.