Model Comparison

o1-mini vs Qwen3 MaxWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 Max is 3.2x cheaper per token.

Verdict: o1-mini vs Qwen3 Max — which is better?

o1-mini (by OpenAI) and Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o1-mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 Max is roughly 3.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose o1-mini if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 Max if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 3.2x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

o1-mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 Max costs less

For input processing, o1-mini ($3.00/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1-mini ($12.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-mini is more expensive than Qwen3 Max.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1-mini
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$12.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$5.00
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to o1-mini's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while o1-mini is limited to 65,536 tokens.

OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 Max

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15.

Qwen3 Max is 15 months newer than o1-mini.

o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 Max

Dec 15, 2025

6 months ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1-mini is available from OpenAI, Azure. Qwen3 Max is available from Novita.

o1-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $12.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $3.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $13.20/1M

Qwen3 Max

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 Max

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (62.0% vs 60.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1-mini
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 Max

FAQ

Common questions about o1-mini vs Qwen3 Max.

Which is better, o1-mini or Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1-mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1-mini compare to Qwen3 Max in benchmarks?

o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%. Qwen3 Max scores AIME 2025: 81.6%, t2-bench: 74.8%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.0%, SuperGPQA: 65.1%.

Is o1-mini cheaper than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1-mini costs $3.00/M input and $12.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 Max costs $0.50/M input and $5.00/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for o1-mini and Qwen3 Max?

o1-mini supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-mini and Qwen3 Max?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 256K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.50/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-mini and Qwen3 Max?

o1-mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 Max is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.