The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

o1-mini vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 10.0.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 10.0, ranking #198 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose o1-mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $12.00/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 20.3 and ranks #198 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
10.0
#269
20.3
#198
10.3
#263
19.2
#204
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$12.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
o1-mini
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
10.9#247
19.5#167
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for o1-mini · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

2 shared

o1-mini outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o1-mini specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only o1-mini specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

OpenAI
o1-mini
Input128,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-mini does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-mini was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 13 months newer than o1-mini.

o1-mini

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o1-mini and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o1-mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about o1-mini vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, o1-mini or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 20.3 to 10.0. o1-mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does o1-mini compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

o1-mini scores HumanEval: 92.4%, MATH-500: 90.0%, MMLU: 85.2%, SuperGLUE: 75.0%, GPQA: 60.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for o1-mini and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

o1-mini supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-mini and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.0 vs 20.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-mini and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

o1-mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.