The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

o1-preview vs Phi 4

o1-preview leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 5.5. Phi 4 is 300.0x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o1-preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 5.5, ranking #218 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o1-preview wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Phi 4 is roughly 300.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

o1-preview also accepts a larger context window (128,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose o1-preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 16.7 and ranks #218 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 6 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 128,000 token context window

Choose Phi 4

  • cost matters — it's about 300.0x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
16.7
#218
5.5
#294
16.9
#211
6.6
#285
-3.2
#250
3.4
#215
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
6 of 6
0 of 6
Input price
$15.00 / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
$60.00 / M
$0.14 / M
Context window
128,000
16,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
o1-preview
Phi 4
20.2#160
12.9#229
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for o1-preview · 13 for Phi 4

6 shared

o1-preview outperforms in 6 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveBench, MATH, MGSM, MMLU, SimpleQA), while Phi 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1-preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Phi 4 costs less

For input processing, o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens) is 214.3x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens) is 428.6x more expensive than Phi 4 ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Phi 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o1-preview
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$60.00
Best providerOpenAI
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input tokens$0.07
Output tokens$0.14
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o1-preview accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Phi 4's 16,000 tokens. o1-preview can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Phi 4 is limited to 16,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o1-preview
Input128,000 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,000 tokens
Output16,000 tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12.

Phi 4 is 3 months newer than o1-preview.

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

2.0 years ago

Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while o1-preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without o1-preview's cutoff date.

o1-preview

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure. Phi 4 is available from DeepInfra.

o1-preview

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M
azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M

Phi 4

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.07/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o1-preview and Phi 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o1-preview
✓ Preferred
Phi 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about o1-preview vs Phi 4.

Which is better, o1-preview or Phi 4?

o1-preview leads the LLM Stats Score 16.7 to 5.5. o1-preview is made by OpenAI and Phi 4 is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does o1-preview compare to Phi 4 in benchmarks?

o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%. Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%.

Is o1-preview cheaper than Phi 4?

Phi 4 is 214.3x cheaper for input tokens. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai. Phi 4 costs $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for o1-preview and Phi 4?

o1-preview supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 supports 16K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-preview and Phi 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (16.7 vs 5.5), context window (128K vs 16K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.07/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-preview and Phi 4?

o1-preview is developed by OpenAI and Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft.