Model Comparison

o1-preview vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 116.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

o1-preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (SimpleQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs less

For input processing, o1-preview ($15.00/1M tokens) is 150.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, o1-preview ($60.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o1-preview is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

o1-preview

Input tokens$15.00

Output tokens$60.00

Best providerOpenAI

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.60

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o1-preview's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while o1-preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

o1-preview

Input128,000 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas o1-preview does not.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1-preview

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-preview is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-preview

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-preview was released on 2024-09-12, while Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 13 months newer than o1-preview.

o1-preview

Sep 12, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

o1-preview is available from OpenAI, Azure. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

o1-preview

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $60.00/1M

Azure

Input Price:Input: $16.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $66.00/1M

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

o1-preview

View details

OpenAI

Higher MMLU score (90.8% vs 77.2%)

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Higher SimpleQA score (48.0% vs 42.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	o1-preview	Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about o1-preview vs Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct.

Which is better, o1-preview or Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. o1-preview is made by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1-preview compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct in benchmarks?

o1-preview scores MGSM: 90.8%, MMLU: 90.8%, MATH: 85.5%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveBench: 52.3%. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.3%, ScreenSpot: 94.0%, OCRBench: 88.1%, MMBench-V1.1: 85.1%, AI2D: 84.1%.

Is o1-preview cheaper than Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is 150.0x cheaper for input tokens. o1-preview costs $15.00/M input and $60.00/M output via openai. Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct costs $0.10/M input and $0.60/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for o1-preview and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

o1-preview supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-preview and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 262K), input pricing ($15.00 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-preview and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct?

o1-preview is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3 VL 4B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.