Model Comparison

o1-pro vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: o1-pro vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking — which is better?

o1-pro (by OpenAI) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o1-pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks. o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose o1-pro if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

o1-pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 0 benchmarks.

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies input context (65,536 tokens). Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

OpenAI
o1-pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o1-pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking does not.

o1-pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o1-pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o1-pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o1-pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o1-pro was released on 2024-12-17, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 9 months newer than o1-pro.

o1-pro

Dec 17, 2024

1.5 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

9 months ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o1-pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o1-pro's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's cutoff date.

o1-pro

Sep 2023

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

OpenAI
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (79.0% vs 77.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Larger context window (65,536 tokens)
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o1-pro
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about o1-pro vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, o1-pro or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o1-pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. o1-pro is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o1-pro compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

o1-pro scores AIME 2024: 86.0%, GPQA: 79.0%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

What are the context window sizes for o1-pro and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o1-pro supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o1-pro and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o1-pro and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

o1-pro is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons