Model Comparison

o3 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507Which is better in 2026?

o3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 3.6x cheaper per token.

Verdict: o3 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 — which is better?

o3 (by OpenAI) and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam). o3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is roughly 3.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose o3 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 6 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 if…

  • cost matters — it's about 3.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

o3 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, Tau2 Airline, Tau2 Retail, Tau2 Telecom), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, Humanity's Last Exam).

o3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs less

For input processing, o3 ($2.00/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, o3 ($8.00/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o3 is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o3's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while o3 is limited to 100,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Wed Jul 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o3 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3 was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 3 months newer than o3.

o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

11 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date.

o3

May 2024

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Provider Availability

o3 is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

o3

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (83.3% vs 81.1%)
Higher Tau2 Airline score (64.8% vs 58.0%)
Higher Tau2 Retail score (80.2% vs 71.9%)
Higher Tau2 Telecom score (58.2% vs 45.6%)
Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher AIME 2025 score (92.3% vs 86.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (18.2% vs 14.7%)
OpenAIo3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o3 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o3
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

FAQ

Common questions about o3 vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, o3 or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o3 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o3 is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o3 compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

Is o3 cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. o3 costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via openai. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for o3 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o3 supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o3 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o3 and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o3 is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.