Model Comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs o3Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs o3 — which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (by Google) and o3 (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Choose o3 if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only o3 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only o3 specifies output context (100,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
o3
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Thu Jul 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

o3 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber does not.

o3 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

o3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

o3

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while o3 was released on 2025-04-16.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is 15 months newer than o3.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

1 days ago

1.3yr newer
o3

Apr 16, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

o3

May 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
GoogleGemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
OpenAIo3

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
o3
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
OpenAI
o3

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs o3.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or o3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (Google) and o3 (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to o3 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. o3 scores COLLIE: 98.4%, AIME 2024: 91.6%, ARC-AGI: 88.0%, MathVista: 86.8%, AIME 2025: 86.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and o3 supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and o3?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and o3 is developed by OpenAI.