Model Comparison

o3-mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o3-mini is 3.1x cheaper per token.

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	o3-mini	Claude 3.7 Sonnet	DeepSeek-R1	Grok-3

FAQ

Common questions about o3-mini vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Which is better, o3-mini or Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o3-mini is made by OpenAI and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o3-mini compare to Claude 3.7 Sonnet in benchmarks?

o3-mini scores COLLIE: 98.7%, MATH: 97.9%, IFEval: 93.9%, MGSM: 92.0%, AIME 2024: 87.3%. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%.

Is o3-mini cheaper than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

o3-mini is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. o3-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via azure. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic.

What are the context window sizes for o3-mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

o3-mini supports 200K tokens and Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o3-mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

Key differences include input pricing ($1.10 vs $3.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o3-mini and Claude 3.7 Sonnet?

o3-mini is developed by OpenAI and Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic.