Model Comparison

o3-mini vs GPT-4oWhich is better in 2026?

o3-mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o3-mini is 2.3x cheaper per token.

Verdict: o3-mini vs GPT-4o — which is better?

o3-mini (by OpenAI) and GPT-4o (by OpenAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

o3-mini outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM), while GPT-4o is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). o3-mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

On price, o3-mini is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

o3-mini also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose o3-mini if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

Choose GPT-4o if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

o3-mini outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MGSM), while GPT-4o is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

o3-mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

o3-mini costs less

For input processing, o3-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than GPT-4o ($2.50/1M tokens).

For output processing, o3-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than GPT-4o ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4o is more expensive than o3-mini.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o3-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerAzure
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input tokens$2.50
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

o3-mini accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4o's 128,000 tokens. o3-mini can generate longer responses up to 100,000 tokens, while GPT-4o is limited to 4,096 tokens.

OpenAI
o3-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4o
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

GPT-4o supports multimodal inputs, whereas o3-mini does not.

GPT-4o can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o3-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4o

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

o3-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4o

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o3-mini was released on 2025-01-30, while GPT-4o was released on 2024-05-13.

o3-mini is 9 months newer than GPT-4o.

o3-mini

Jan 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

8mo newer
GPT-4o

May 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o3-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-09-30, while GPT-4o's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o3-mini's training data extends to 2023-09-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without GPT-4o's cutoff date.

o3-mini

Sep 2023

GPT-4o

Provider Availability

o3-mini is available from Azure, OpenAI. GPT-4o is available from Azure, OpenAI.

o3-mini

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

GPT-4o

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $2.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (77.2% vs 53.6%)
Higher MATH score (97.9% vs 76.6%)
Higher MGSM score (92.0% vs 90.5%)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (88.7% vs 86.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
OpenAI
o3-mini
OpenAI
GPT-4o

FAQ

Common questions about o3-mini vs GPT-4o.

Which is better, o3-mini or GPT-4o?

o3-mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. o3-mini is made by OpenAI and GPT-4o is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does o3-mini compare to GPT-4o in benchmarks?

o3-mini scores COLLIE: 98.7%, MATH: 97.9%, IFEval: 93.9%, MGSM: 92.0%, AIME 2024: 87.3%. GPT-4o scores MGSM: 90.5%, HumanEval: 90.2%, MMLU: 88.7%, DROP: 83.4%, MATH: 76.6%.

Is o3-mini cheaper than GPT-4o?

o3-mini is 2.3x cheaper for input tokens. o3-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via azure. GPT-4o costs $2.50/M input and $10.00/M output via azure.

What are the context window sizes for o3-mini and GPT-4o?

o3-mini supports 200K tokens and GPT-4o supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o3-mini and GPT-4o?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($1.10 vs $2.50/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.