The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

o4-mini vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched at 27.5 and 28.1 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 2.0x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 27.5 and 28.1.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, o4-mini wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is roughly 2.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose o4-mini

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results

Choose Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

  • cost matters — it's about 2.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
27.5
#142
28.1
#134
27.5
#135
28.4
#127
7.2
#138
11.5
#107
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 5
1 of 5
Input price
$1.10 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
200,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
o4-mini
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
27.6#97
31.3#69
15.8#89
12.1#105
11.6#110
10.8#118
12.4#62
16.4#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for o4-mini · 25 for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

5 shared

o4-mini outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

o4-mini significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs less

For input processing, o4-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, o4-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 ($3.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o4-mini is more expensive than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o4-mini's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while o4-mini is limited to 100,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Sep 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o4-mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 does not.

o4-mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o4-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o4-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 was released on 2025-07-25.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 3 months newer than o4-mini.

o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Jul 25, 2025

1.1 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507's cutoff date.

o4-mini

May 2024

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

Provider Availability

o4-mini is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita.

o4-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o4-mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about o4-mini vs Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507.

Which is better, o4-mini or Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 27.5 and 28.1. o4-mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does o4-mini compare to Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 in benchmarks?

o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.8%, AIME 2025: 92.3%, WritingBench: 88.3%, IFEval: 87.8%, Creative Writing v3: 86.1%.

Is o4-mini cheaper than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is 3.7x cheaper for input tokens. o4-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via openai. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 costs $0.30/M input and $3.00/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o4-mini supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.5 vs 28.1), context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.10 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o4-mini and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507?

o4-mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-235B-A22B-Thinking-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.