The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

o4-mini vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct are closely matched at 27.4 and 21.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 4.1x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 27.4 and 21.0.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is roughly 4.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose o4-mini

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 4.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
27.4
#159
21.0
#205
27.4
#150
21.1
#198
11.8
#165
12.1
#164
7.0
#152
5.2
#161
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
$1.10 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$4.40 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
200,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
o4-mini
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
11.5#121
12.5#114
12.3#64
17.6#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for o4-mini · 10 for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

4 shared

o4-mini outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Aider-Polyglot), while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (SWE-Bench Verified, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail).

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs less

For input processing, o4-mini ($1.10/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, o4-mini ($4.40/1M tokens) is 4.4x more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, o4-mini is more expensive than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
o4-mini
Input tokens$1.10
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerOpenAI
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to o4-mini's 200,000 tokens. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while o4-mini is limited to 100,000 tokens.

OpenAI
o4-mini
Input200,000 tokens
Output100,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sat Oct 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

o4-mini supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

o4-mini can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

o4-mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

o4-mini is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

o4-mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

o4-mini was released on 2025-04-16, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31.

o4-mini is 3 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

o4-mini

Apr 16, 2025

1.5 years ago

2mo newer
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

o4-mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm o4-mini's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct's cutoff date.

o4-mini

May 2024

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

—

Provider Availability

o4-mini is available from OpenAI. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is available from DeepInfra.

o4-mini

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

o4-mini
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about o4-mini vs Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Which is better, o4-mini or Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 27.4 and 21.0. o4-mini is made by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does o4-mini compare to Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct in benchmarks?

o4-mini scores AIME 2024: 93.4%, AIME 2025: 92.7%, MathVista: 84.3%, MMMU: 81.6%, GPQA: 81.4%. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%.

Is o4-mini cheaper than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is 3.7x cheaper for input tokens. o4-mini costs $1.10/M input and $4.40/M output via openai. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

o4-mini supports 200K tokens and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (27.4 vs 21.0), context window (200K vs 262K), input pricing ($1.10 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes o4-mini and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct?

o4-mini is developed by OpenAI and Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.