The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Microsoft · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 3 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA, MMLU-Pro). Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.10 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
Released
Aug 2024
Apr 2025
License
MIT
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning is better at 3 benchmarks (Arena Hard, GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.2B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning has 10.2B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 268.4% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8Bparameters
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
3.8B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 8 months newer than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Phi-3.5-mini-instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Phi-3.5-mini-instruct's cutoff date.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Phi 4 Reasoning.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Phi 4 Reasoning?

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is made by Microsoft and Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-mini-instruct compare to Phi 4 Reasoning in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct scores GSM8k: 86.2%, ARC-C: 84.6%, RULER: 84.1%, PIQA: 81.0%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%. Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Phi 4 Reasoning?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.