Model Comparison

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct — which is better?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi-3.5-mini-instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.2B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 29.2B more parameters than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct, making it 768.4% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
3.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
3.8B
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Phi-3.5-mini-instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-mini-instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 13 months newer than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct.

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (68.9% vs 30.4%)
Higher MMLU score (86.4% vs 69.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (78.6% vs 47.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-mini-instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi-3.5-mini-instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct scores GSM8k: 86.2%, ARC-C: 84.6%, RULER: 84.1%, PIQA: 81.0%, OpenBookQA: 79.2%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-mini-instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.