The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs QvQ-72B-Preview

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 8.0 to 1.9.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.0 to 1.9, ranking #271 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.0 and ranks #271 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
1.9
#306
8.0
#271
1.4
#299
8.3
#264
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
QvQ-72B-Preview
4.7#274
9.8#245
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

No common benchmarks found

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and QvQ-72B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

13.4B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 13.4B more parameters than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct, making it 22.3% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
60.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
60.0B
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

QvQ-72B-Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct does not.

QvQ-72B-Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is licensed under MIT, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

MIT

Open weights

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 4 months newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.0 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct or QvQ-72B-Preview?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 8.0 to 1.9. Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is made by Microsoft and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct scores ARC-C: 91.0%, OpenBookQA: 89.6%, GSM8k: 88.7%, PIQA: 88.6%, RULER: 87.1%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (1.9 vs 8.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is developed by Microsoft and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.