Model Comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct outperforms in 6 benchmarks (ARC-C, HellaSwag, MATH, MMLU, TruthfulQA, Winogrande), while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GSM8k, HumanEval, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct has 28.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 87.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1 month newer than Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct.
Aug 23, 2024
1.8 years ago
Sep 19, 2024
1.7 years ago
3w newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
View detailsMicrosoft
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.