The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -3.4.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -3.4, ranking #298 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5-Omni-7B wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 5.2 and ranks #298 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-3.4
#343
5.2
#298
-4.8
#343
1.4
#311
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 5
5 of 5
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
-3.6#194
5.2#152
-1.1#156
6.7#131
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Phi-3.5-vision-instruct · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

5 shared

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 5 benchmarks (AI2D, ChartQA, MathVista, MMMU, TextVQA).

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.8B diff

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B has 2.8B more parameters than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct, making it 66.7% larger.

Microsoft
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
4.2Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
4.2B
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is licensed under MIT, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

MIT

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct was released on 2024-08-23, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 7 months newer than Phi-3.5-vision-instruct.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct

Aug 23, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.5 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi-3.5-vision-instruct vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Phi-3.5-vision-instruct or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B leads the LLM Stats Score 5.2 to -3.4. Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is made by Microsoft and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi-3.5-vision-instruct compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct scores ScienceQA: 91.3%, POPE: 86.1%, MMBench: 81.9%, ChartQA: 81.8%, AI2D: 78.1%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the main differences between Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-3.4 vs 5.2), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi-3.5-vision-instruct and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Phi-3.5-vision-instruct is developed by Microsoft and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.