The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 7.3 and 20.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.3 and 20.4.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.3
#278
20.4
#185
7.6
#269
19.4
#189
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

3 reported for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

1 shared

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.2B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 29.2B more parameters than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning, making it 768.4% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
3.8Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
3.8B
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Mini Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.3 and 20.4. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi 4 Mini Reasoning compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.3 vs 20.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Mini Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.