The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 32B

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B are closely matched at 15.0 and 18.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.0 and 18.4.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 32B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Qwen3 32B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.0
#239
18.4
#220
15.4
#232
18.6
#214
5.7
#204
8.9
#186
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 4
3 of 4
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
40,960

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Qwen3 32B
18.3#184
21.2#150
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus · 9 for Qwen3 32B

4 shared

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 32B is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, Arena Hard, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 32B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.8B diff

Qwen3 32B has 18.8B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 134.3% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (40,960 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (40,960 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input40,960 tokens
Output40,960 tokens
Wed Sep 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is 0 month newer than Qwen3 32B.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

1d newer
Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

1.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 32B's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3 32B

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 32B.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 32B?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.0 and 18.4. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3 32B in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 41K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.0 vs 18.4), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 32B?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.