Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus if…

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AIME 2025), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

17.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 17.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 121.4% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher AIME 2025 score (78.0% vs 69.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 68.9%)
Higher IFEval score (85.8% vs 84.9%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.8% vs 76.0%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.