The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched at 15.2 and 20.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Microsoft · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.2 and 20.4.

The models split the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you are already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
15.2
#219
20.4
#185
15.5
#213
19.4
#189
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 4
2 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
18.3#174
19.7#156
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus · 45 for Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

4 shared

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, IFEval), while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU-Pro).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

19.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct has 19.0B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus, making it 135.7% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
33.0Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning Plus vs Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 15.2 and 20.4. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning Plus compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%. Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.9%, ScreenSpot: 95.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.5%, MMLU-Redux: 89.8%, AI2D: 89.5%.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.2 vs 20.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning Plus and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 32B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.