Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 30B A3BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 30B A3B — which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 30B A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Arena Hard, LiveCodeBench). Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose Qwen3 30B A3B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 5 of 5 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Arena Hard, LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

16.5B diff

Qwen3 30B A3B has 16.5B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 117.9% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
30.5Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning
30.5B
Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 30B A3B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Mon Jul 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 30B A3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 0 month newer than Qwen3 30B A3B.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

1d newer
Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 30B A3B's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Qwen3 30B A3B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Higher AIME 2024 score (80.4% vs 75.3%)
Higher AIME 2025 score (70.9% vs 62.9%)
Higher Arena Hard score (91.0% vs 73.3%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (62.6% vs 53.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 30B A3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4 Reasoning
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 30B A3B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 30B A3B.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning or Qwen3 30B A3B?

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 30B A3B?

Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 30B A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.