Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 4B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking — which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning (by Microsoft) and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025). Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

10.0B diff

Phi 4 Reasoning has 10.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking, making it 250.0% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
4.0Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning
4.0B
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Wed Jun 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning does not.

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is 5 months newer than Phi 4 Reasoning.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking's cutoff date.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 64.1%)
Higher IFEval score (83.4% vs 82.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (74.3% vs 73.6%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (74.5% vs 62.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning vs Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning or Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning compare to Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%. Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 94.2%, ScreenSpot: 92.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 86.7%, MMLU-Redux: 86.0%, AI2D: 84.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking?

Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft and Qwen3 VL 4B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.