Model Comparison

Phi 4 Reasoning vs QwQ-32B-PreviewWhich is better in 2026?

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Phi 4 Reasoning vs QwQ-32B-Preview — which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning (by Microsoft) and QwQ-32B-Preview (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 0 benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025

Choose QwQ-32B-Preview if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Phi 4 Reasoning outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.5B diff

QwQ-32B-Preview has 18.5B more parameters than Phi 4 Reasoning, making it 132.1% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
14.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
32.5Bparameters
14.0B
Phi 4 Reasoning
32.5B
QwQ-32B-Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies input context (32,768 tokens). Only QwQ-32B-Preview specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 Reasoning is licensed under MIT, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4 Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

Phi 4 Reasoning is 5 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.

Phi 4 Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.1 years ago

5mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning has a knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while QwQ-32B-Preview has a cutoff of 2024-11-28.

Phi 4 Reasoning has more recent training data (up to 2025-03-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to QwQ-32B-Preview (2024-11-28).

Phi 4 Reasoning

Mar 2025

4 mo newer
QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Microsoft
Higher AIME 2024 score (75.3% vs 50.0%)
Higher GPQA score (65.8% vs 65.2%)
Higher LiveCodeBench score (53.8% vs 50.0%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (32,768 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 Reasoning vs QwQ-32B-Preview.

Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning or QwQ-32B-Preview?

Phi 4 Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Phi 4 Reasoning is made by Microsoft and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Phi 4 Reasoning compare to QwQ-32B-Preview in benchmarks?

Phi 4 Reasoning scores FlenQA: 97.7%, HumanEval+: 92.9%, IFEval: 83.4%, OmniMath: 76.6%, AIME 2024: 75.3%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 Reasoning and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Phi 4 Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 Reasoning and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Key differences include licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 Reasoning and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Phi 4 Reasoning is developed by Microsoft and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons