The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Phi 4 vs Sarvam-30B

Sarvam-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.4.

Microsoft · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Sarvam-30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.4, ranking #205 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-30B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Phi 4

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.14/M output

Choose Sarvam-30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.6 and ranks #205 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
5.4
#299
19.6
#205
6.5
#290
19.3
#203
3.4
#220
5.9
#196
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
$0.07 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Context window
16,384

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Phi 4
Sarvam-30B
12.8#230
23.6#125
12.9#137
18.2#99
12.9#120
18.2#85
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Phi 4 · 14 for Sarvam-30B

4 shared

Phi 4 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Sarvam-30B is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU, MMLU-Pro).

Sarvam-30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

15.3B diff

Sarvam-30B has 15.3B more parameters than Phi 4, making it 104.1% larger.

Microsoft
Phi 4
14.7Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
30.0Bparameters
14.7B
Phi 4
30.0B
Sarvam-30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Phi 4 specifies input context (16,384 tokens). Only Phi 4 specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Microsoft
Phi 4
Input16,384 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Phi 4 is licensed under MIT, while Sarvam-30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Phi 4

MIT

Open weights

Sarvam-30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Phi 4 was released on 2024-12-12, while Sarvam-30B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-30B is 15 months newer than Phi 4.

Phi 4

Dec 12, 2024

1.8 years ago

Sarvam-30B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Sarvam-30B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Sarvam-30B's cutoff date.

Phi 4

Jun 2024

Sarvam-30B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Phi 4 and Sarvam-30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Phi 4
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Phi 4 vs Sarvam-30B.

Which is better, Phi 4 or Sarvam-30B?

Sarvam-30B leads the LLM Stats Score 19.6 to 5.4. Phi 4 is made by Microsoft and Sarvam-30B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Phi 4 compare to Sarvam-30B in benchmarks?

Phi 4 scores MMLU: 84.8%, HumanEval+: 82.8%, HumanEval: 82.6%, MGSM: 80.6%, MATH: 80.4%. Sarvam-30B scores MATH-500: 97.0%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MBPP: 92.7%, HumanEval: 92.1%, MMLU: 85.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Phi 4 and Sarvam-30B?

Phi 4 supports 16K tokens and Sarvam-30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Phi 4 and Sarvam-30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.4 vs 19.6), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Phi 4 and Sarvam-30B?

Phi 4 is developed by Microsoft and Sarvam-30B is developed by Sarvam AI.