The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Pixtral-12B vs QvQ-72B-Preview

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 8.0 to -1.4.

Mistral AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.0 to -1.4, ranking #271 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, QvQ-72B-Preview wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Pixtral-12B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.15/M output

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.0 and ranks #271 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.4
#324
8.0
#271
-3.5
#324
8.3
#264
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Pixtral-12B
QvQ-72B-Preview
1.3#286
9.8#245
0.6#175
6.8#141
4.4#136
10.1#113
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Pixtral-12B · 4 for QvQ-72B-Preview

2 shared

Pixtral-12B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QvQ-72B-Preview is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

QvQ-72B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

61.0B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 61.0B more parameters than Pixtral-12B, making it 491.9% larger.

Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
12.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
12.4B
Pixtral-12B
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Pixtral-12B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Pixtral-12B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Mistral AI
Pixtral-12B
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Pixtral-12B and QvQ-72B-Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Pixtral-12B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Pixtral-12B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while QvQ-72B-Preview uses Qwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Pixtral-12B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Pixtral-12B was released on 2024-09-17, while QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25.

QvQ-72B-Preview is 3 months newer than Pixtral-12B.

Pixtral-12B

Sep 17, 2024

2.0 years ago

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Pixtral-12B and QvQ-72B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Pixtral-12B
✓ Preferred
QvQ-72B-Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Pixtral-12B vs QvQ-72B-Preview.

Which is better, Pixtral-12B or QvQ-72B-Preview?

QvQ-72B-Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 8.0 to -1.4. Pixtral-12B is made by Mistral AI and QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Pixtral-12B compare to QvQ-72B-Preview in benchmarks?

Pixtral-12B scores DocVQA: 90.7%, ChartQA: 81.8%, VQAv2: 78.6%, MT-Bench: 76.8%, HumanEval: 72.0%. QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Pixtral-12B and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Pixtral-12B supports 128K tokens and QvQ-72B-Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Pixtral-12B and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.4 vs 8.0), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Pixtral-12B and QvQ-72B-Preview?

Pixtral-12B is developed by Mistral AI and QvQ-72B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.